Matthew 13:24-30, 36-43
He put before them another parable…
Have you ever wondered why Jesus did so much of his teaching with parables? When his disciples asked him about that he said that he spoke in parables because people are not very good at listening. “The reason I speak to them in parables,” he said, “is that ‘seeing they do not perceive, and hearing they do not listen, nor do they understand.’”[1] When he was teaching about God’s commonwealth of justice and kindness, he knew that people would not retain what he was saying if he simply gave them factual information, so he told them enigmatic little stories that he knew they would take away with them.
Parables are living stories. They are stories that use real-life examples to shape the way we think. Since so much of what Jesus was teaching was about envisioning a whole new way of life with very different values, he wanted people to spend time with the ideas he was sharing. So he gave them parables that hinted at his deeper message—stories that they could carry away with them so that they could feel some ownership of the vision when they worked out the riddles for themselves.
The stories and symbols of a parable almost always work on more than one level of understanding. The parables of Jesus were brilliant in that they often work on three levels—they point to a cosmic interpretation, a community interpretation, and a personal interpretation. When Jesus talks about “the kingdom of heaven” in these parables he is pointing to the ultimate cosmic reign of God and the beloved community of faith and the internal life of the individual believer. He wants his followers to understand that the Empire of Heaven is not only a longed-for future waiting to be fulfilled, it is also a very present vision that shapes the life of the beloved community as it transforms the hearts and minds of each individual follower of Jesus. The kingdom is future. But the kingdom is also now.
The parable of the Weeds Among the Wheat is one of four consecutive “organic” parables in Matthew which almost pile up on each other when you’re reading them: The Sower, The Weeds, The Mustard Seed, and The Parable of the Yeast. Taken together they have a common theme. In these stories the kingdom is organic—it doesn’t just suddenly appear out of nowhere. Instead, it grows slowly and steadily, unobserved, often in unexpected ways and places and even in spite of opposition and challenges. But while these stories share this basic idea, each one has its own distinct message about different aspects of life under the rule and reign of God, so it’s important to give each one time to percolate.
The Parable of the Sower and the Parable of the Mustard Seed are in all three synoptic gospels, Matthew, Mark and Luke. The Parable of the Yeast is in both Matthew and Luke. But the Parable of the Weeds Among the Wheat is only in Matthew.
So with all that in mind, what is Jesus teaching us when he says, “The kingdom of heaven may be compared to someone who sowed good seed in his field; but while everybody was asleep, an enemy came and sowed weeds among the wheat, and then went away.”
On the surface the message of the parable is fairly simple: Jesus is telling us that there’s bad stuff in the world mixed in with the good that God intended. Why? “An enemy has done this.” Literally, in the Greek it says “a person who was hostile” did this. So right there we are invited to think about that dynamic on at least three levels. On the cosmic level, who or what is hostile to God’s Domain? More locally, who or what is hostile to the community of faith? On a personal level, who or what is hostile to your own spiritual growth? This is a bigger question than just “Who is the enemy?” The door is open for us to think of any number of persons or entities or systems who might be hostile to seeing the love and generosity of God become sovereign in the world and in our community and in each of our own lives.
One of the details we’re likely to miss if we just read this parable in our English translations is just how hostile this act of sowing weeds in the wheat field really is. Jesus is describing a situation that is potentially deadly. This is not just any old dandelion that the enemy has scattered in the wheat field; in the Greek text, Jesus says it is zizania. Farmers today know it as Bearded Darnel. Australians call it “sleepy wheat,” and botanists know it by its Latin name: Lolium temulentum.
This weed looks so much like wheat that it’s easy to mistake it for wheat and vice versa. But learning to spot the difference is critically important because the fungus that lives in Bearded Darnel’s seeds produces a potent neurotoxin. Eating just a small amount of this grain can cause dizziness, trembling, weakness, ataxia, confusion and delirium. Eating more can kill you which would be a relief since that would put a stop to all the nasty gastrointestinal misery this weed would be giving you.
It’s no wonder the landowner’s servants in this Jesus story want to pull up this noxious weed as soon as they see it, but the landowner says no. The landowner knows that the roots of the darnel will have tangled themselves in the roots of the wheat. You can’t pull up one without pulling up the other. The landowner also knows that as long as the weeds are in his field it’s contained. He can keep an eye on it and keep it from spreading.
Matthew was writing his gospel in a community that was living under incredible stress. Clues in the text tell us that this was a community of Jewish Christians who were struggling to faithfully live our both their Jewish heritage and their new identity as followers of Jesus, but their belief that Jesus was the promised Messiah led to conflict with their friends and family in the synagogue and Jewish community. Their communal life as believers also created tensions with their Gentile neighbors who were trying to avoid being noticed any more than necessary by the occupying Romans. These Gentile neighbors were trying to keep their distance because when Matthew’s gospel was being written the Roman Empire viewed Christians with suspicion. The Romans viewed Christians as a troublesome, defiant and anti-social splinter group because they publicly refused to worship the emperor and the Roman gods, which was considered a sacred civic duty. The Empire saw the Christians as weeds in their field.
Matthew probably included this parable in his gospel because it spoke directly to the community’s questions, concerns and anxieties. On the cosmic level it addresses the question of theodicy, the problem of evil—
- If God is sovereign, why is there evil in the world?
Answer: because there are forces at work in the world that are hostile to God’s sovereignty.
- What is the nature of evil?
Answer: It can be a counterfeit good. It mimics the good and grows alongside it until it becomes difficult to root it out without damaging the good.
- Why is there conflict in the community?
Answer: Because often the counterfeit is mistaken for the real thing. What one group thinks is wheat another group thinks is weeds and there are people on both sides who want to rush in and pull up what they think are the weeds.
In his Augsburg Commentary on Matthew, Robert Smith said, “In Matthew’s day and in every generation it takes little talent to finger members of the community who look like bad seed. Where do they come from? It is easy to lose confidence in the way God runs the universe.”[2]
It’s an unfortunate trait of human nature that we tend to identify people and ideas we don’t like as poisonous weeds in our otherwise lovely and wholesome field. We see this every day in politics. We see it at school. We see it at work. We see it in science and medicine. We see it everywhere human beings are interacting with each other. We see weeds in our field and we instinctively want to yank them up by the roots. It’s like there’s some old hillbilly song stuck in our brains: “Life would be almost perfect, dontcha know, if we just got rid of so-and-so.”
Jesus says to let the weeds grow. The reapers will take care of them when the time comes. But almost from the beginning, the church seems to have not been listening to that particular instruction.
You’ve all heard the word heresy, right? It comes from the Greek heiresis which means “to take or choose for oneself.” In Greek debate it was used to describe “a differing opinion.” In the church it came to mean “a belief or opinion that is contrary to orthodox doctrine.” Unfortunately, it also has often meant, “Look! Here’s a weed! Quick, let’s pull it!”
In 431, at the Council of Ephesus, the teachings of the British Monk and theologian, Pelagius, were condemned as heresy. Fortunately for Pelagius, he had died in 418 or he might have been in for a rough time, not that he hadn’t been roughed up a bit while he was still alive. After all, you don’t go toe-to-toe with powerful bishops like Augustine and Jerome without getting a few bruises to your reputation. Or your body. Theologians played rough in those days.
In 1415, Jan Hus, a Czech academic theologian, philosopher and priest was burned at the stake as a heretic for condemning indulgences and crusades and for advocating that the scriptures should be translated into the languages of the common people so that everyone could read them for themselves. The Church said that was heresy.
In 1431 Joan of Arc was burned at the stake for heresy and cross dressing. The case against her for heresy was weak, and Joan answered the inquisition’s questions with such pious intelligence that the English bishops hearing her case were ready to dismiss the theological heresy charges. But they had her dead to rights on the charge of dressing like a man. Plus, they felt she needed to be punished for being such an inspiring military leader and a brilliant military strategist, talents that were not appreciated in a woman.
In 1521, Martin Luther was condemned as a heretic and sentenced to death for his widely circulated writings insisting on church reform. Some of the reforms he advocated had been proposed by Jan Hus a hundred years earlier. Luther had developed a large popular following and his denunciation of indulgences hit the church right in the wallet. Fortunately, because he was under the protection of Frederick the Wise, the powerful duke of Saxony, Luther’s opponents were never able to capture him and execute him.
In 1633, Galileo Galilei was declared a heretic and forced to recant his assertion that the earth moves around the sun and not the other way around. He died under house arrest 9 years later, but 359 years later in 1992 he was vindicated when Pope John Paul II admitted that Galileo was right, the earth does move around the sun. And in the year 2000, a mere 8 years after admitting that Galileo was right, the Church held a ceremony in which they issued him a formal apology. Galileo, who had been dead for 358 years at that point, was unable to attend.
In his book Parables of the Kingdom, Robert Farrrar Capon reminds us that the enemy who sows the weeds doesn’t have any real power over goodness. The wheat in the parable is already sown. The reign of God is already in the world and there’s nothing the enemy can do about it. But, “he can sucker the forces of goodness into taking up arms against the confusion he has introduced, to do his work for him. That is why he goes away after sowing the weeds. He has no need to hang around. Unable to take positive action anyway—having no real power to muck up the operation—he simply sprinkles around a generous helping of darkness and waits for the children of light to get flustered enough to do the job for him.”[3]
All these heretics, all these persons with differing views, were seen in their time as weeds in the field. Some were pulled and burned, ignoring the advice of Jesus: Let both of them grow together until the harvest. He tells those who are eager to yank up the weeds that they’re likely to pull up the wheat, too. Jesus also leaves a cautionary question hanging in the air, a question that echoes through this parable and our history: What makes you so sure you know the difference between weeds and wheat?
Today, a fair number of theologians are thinking that maybe Pelagius wasn’t entirely wrong and maybe Augustine wasn’t entirely right. Jan Hus is commemorated as a martyr whose ideas planted seeds that flourished in the Reformation. Joan of Arc has been canonized as a saint and nobody much cares that she wore pants. Martin Luther is acknowledge as a titanic figure who not only ignited the Reformation but set the stage for the Enlightenment. And Galileo opened our minds to the notion that religious dogma should not stand in opposition to the empirical observations of science.
Time and time again throughout our history, persons and ideas that were thought to be weeds in the field turned out to be wheat after all.
So if you think that some person or some group are weeds in the field and need to be uprooted because their ideas or habits or opinions differ from yours, maybe it would be best to leave them alone, to live and let live, and leave the judgment to the more far-sighted understanding of God.
Let both of them grow together until the harvest; and at harvest time I will tell the reapers, Collect the weeds first and bind them in bundles to be burned, but gather the wheat into my barn.
Do not judge and you will not be judged. Don’t be in such a hurry to yank those ideas or persons you think are weeds out of God’s field. Grow and let grow. Because that’s what Jesus said to do.
[1] Matthew 13:13
[2] Augsburg Commentary on the New Testament: Matthew; Robert H. Smith, 1998, p.178
[3] Robert Farrar Capon; Parables of the Kingdom, Eerdmans Publishing Co, 1991.